If you have been under a rock for the past few years then maybe it has escaped your notice about the trial and conviction of Baby P’s mother, step father and a lodger for the neglection to protect the youngster from his cruel, cruel death. The toddler was found dead with over fifty injuries, including a broken back after being on the Child Protection register in Harring, London for most of his young life. Although the courts did not convict the mother and men in the case of murder, they were convicted of his manslaughter, meaning they did nothing to prevent his death.

Many of us know that it is blindingly obvious that the men involved were guilty of causing the injuries that led to the child’s death and that the child’s mother was guilty of covering up the heinous crimes. She was accused of spreading chocolate spread across the child’s face to cover up bruises when social workers came to call. And with the investigations into the many authorities involved in the lack of protecting this young child, we can conclude that his death should have and could have been avoided if those involved had taken more responsibility.

That aside, I want to address a sickening issue I read this morning on the sky news website.
Baby P’s mother to get an identity package including a fitness Guru

So this woman who allowed her child to be beaten to death, in such a brutal literal sense, is going to get a brand new life at the expense of the British tax payer. It isn’t enough that we were the ones paying for the social workers to attempt to protect her children, now we are supposed to protect a woman who has openly told friends she plans to “party” when she gets out of jail after her three year sentence.

How can we call this justice? A woman who allowed two sick men to beat her toddler over a period of time, continually taking him to the doctors and covering up these horrific crimes is now going to get a life style change and an identity package that should in sense “protect” her from what the justice system fears will be vigil anti groups. But who was protecting Baby Peter while his mother continued to allow men living in her home to abuse him? Where does the protection truly lie? With the victim or the perpetrator? Shouldn’t we just let this woman get what she deserves? Why the hell are we protecting criminals of such heinous crimes, when we couldn’t protect the victim? And what kind of justice is that for a child who did not ask to be born into that hell that he knew as life! How is this fair and just? Are we not living in a society where reasonable justification for crimes should be in practice?

A civilised society should not allow this joke of a proposition play out! after all, she committed more of a moral crime than any of us could ever truly understand. a mother is the one who bears children and instantly, that child looks to their mother and father to protect them. A mother’s arms are meant to be the safest place for a child to settle and rest but sadly Baby Peter could never feel that safety because Tracy Connelly preferred to maintain the sick relationship she and Steven Barker were in along with Jason Owen instead of doing her ultimate moral duty to protect her children! She main not have initiated the blows, none of us will ever know the truth, but she never stopped them from happening or alert the authorities that her child was in danger. She was as the judge described her, “selfish and self-centred” and people like that who allow such horrific acts to be performed on children should never be released back into society let alone be given protection.

The British justice system and the human rights act are a complete and utter joke if all they can do is protect the criminals. If that is what a justice system is these days, then maybe there is no point in having a justice system at all. A justice system is meant to protect the victims but in this case, giving a woman who knowingly allowed people to abuse her child, a fitness instructor, a stylist and a new identity at the cost of the tax payer is completely unreasonable and unfair.

What kind of a message is this sending out to criminals? Commit whatever heinous crime you choose because when you have served your time, don’t worry about it, we as the British justice system shall not protect the memories of your victims but shall concentrate solely on your protection. It is laughable and the British government wonder why the justice system is nothing to be reckoned with in our country? Kill a child, get a free stylist and personal fitness trainer, whatever next? If this is what you call a state with a justice system, then I’d rather pass on it. If victims are being forgotten and the safety of someone who has committed a crime is being made priority, then what should they, the government expect? respect? Credibility? Not from your law abiding citizens.

Should the general public know about her whereabouts and her true identity? Yes! Don’t we know about the identities and whereabouts of sex offenders? Is she in danger? Of course she is. Do we as the general public care? No! Do I believe she should get what she deserves? Yes. I am not an unreasonable person and do believe that people should serve their time and be given a second chance if they have reformed but to hear a woman who is locked up for the manslaughter of her own baby and who is bragging about the lifestyle change she is going to receive, then no, rationality goes out of the window. She got three years for the unprevented death of her baby son and she is now talking about flying around the world and “living one long party”, then no, she deserves every piece of torture people give her. She allowed two grown men to abuse a defenceless child that she bore and women like that need locking up and throwing away the key. Do we really want monsters like that in our society unbeknown to innocent men who may impregnate her and have a similar situation happen again? Would you like your son to have a child with Tracy Connelly? Would you allow a monster to continue to live in this world free and living a life of luxury? If yes, then you’re a real idiot. This is my opinion but factually, she is going to be released and have a life better than most of us because she allowed a child to be tortured to death, if you think that is acceptable then you need to really reassess your priorities.